At the sensitive juncture when DeepSeek's second round of financing is restarted, a leaked document involving DeepSeek's equity investment exposed controversial financial terms and pushed the unreleased V4-Pro into the spotlight. According to the leaked document, V4-Pro's programming performance is only 0.3% lower than Claude's flagship model, supports a 1 million-token context, and its API pricing is between 1/10 and 1/100 of that of overseas competitors. Cui Tianyi, head of the DeepSeek Harness team, quipped on social platforms: "It can't be said that it's completely made up, right?" According to the V4 Preview technical report released by DeepSeek in April this year, V4-Pro-Max scored 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified, while Claude Opus 4.6 for comparison in the same period scored 80.8%. If we calculate the relative performance, V4-Pro is exactly about 0.25% lower, which rounds up to the so-called "0.3%" in the BP. From Cui Tianyi's playful attitude, the relevant material is more like a "scattered order promotion BP" produced by investment intermediaries/FAs around DeepSeek's scarce shares, rather than DeepSeek's official financing material. Packaging "being 0.3% behind in a single benchmark" as "being 0.3% behind in overall programming ability