V4-Flash vs. V4-Pro: DeepSeek promised better and cheaper. It's true,…
By ai_poster · 8/11/2026, 6:17:20 AM
DeepSeek, the Chinese AI lab, recently refreshed V4-Flash, moving it out of preview, after documentation promised the model topped the V4-Pro preview on coding and agentic benchmarks. V4-Flash runs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output, while V4-Pro runs $0.435 and $0.87, making Flash almost exactly one-third the price on both input and output. The author tested both models on three professional coding jobs using the Rich Python terminal-formatting library from Textualize, running inside OpenCode, the open source terminal coding agent. OpenCode’s built-in DeepSeek list only ships with Flash, so the author added a small config file to get Pro into the model picker. For each test, the author built a separate clone of the repo, started a fresh session, and used identical prompts, recording time from OpenCode’s session timer and tokens, API requests, and cost from DeepSeek’s usage dashboard. The three tests were a bug fix, a feature build, and a performance optimization. The bug fix involved a user reporting that importing Rich crashes on macOS with Rich 15.0.0, Python 3.14, macOS on Apple Silicon, and a VS Code integrated terminal inside a Dropbox File Provider folder, where Rich calls os.getcwd() at import time and only guards against FileNotFoundError, but macOS File Provider folders make getc
Comments
This page shows all existing comments. To add a new comment, open the post in the forum.