A recent paper in *Cureus* examines the ethical implications of deploying uninterpretable artificial intelligence (AI) systems in high-risk clinical environments within the NHS, such as emergency department triage, diagnostic support, and risk stratification. Using a constructed vignette of sepsis misclassification, the authors argue that algorithmic opacity may undermine clinicians' ability to satisfy justificatory obligations within the professional and legal framework of the UK Duty of Candour. The paper distinguishes between ordinary clinical uncertainty and structural opacity arising from system design, arguing that the latter weakens traceability, accountability, and meaningful explanation after patient harm. The authors further argue that interpretability should be treated as a safety-relevant ethical requirement in high-risk clinical contexts, rather than as an optional technical feature subordinate to predictive performance alone.